VIPVIP | | RSS
    Association Introduction | Association Event | Industry Information | Member News | Special Report | Technology Exchange
 
Positon: Home » Member News » news »

New York Auto Glass Shop Owner Responds to Insurers in Ongoing Anti-Trust, Breach of Contract Suit

  • Released Date:2011-08-19
  • Valid until:Standing
  • View Time221
  • Details

An auto glass shop’s suit against 14 insurers and two third-party administrators continues in a Federal court in New York. David Harner, owner of Auto Glass of Westchester Windshield Doctor, alleges those involved have committed breach of contract, fraud, unfair claims settlement practices, restraint of trade, anti-trust, and coercion, among other charges, through their alleged actions in dealing with his business and his customers. In July, the insurers’ filed memos with the court advising of their intentions to motion to dismiss the suit and Harner’s response to those memos has been released by the court.

“The essence of this complaint are the defendants’ unreasonable actions that those defendants undertake in their attempt to control a market for those defendants benefit, at the expense of the consumer,” says Harner in a letter to the judge. “This action is about the defendant’s failure to pay the ‘fair and equitable,’ ‘reasonable and customary’ and ‘reasonable’ charges submitted by the plaintiff to the defendants. The defendant’s actions are designed to force the plaintiff to perform work in a specific manner and charge amounts specified by the defendants for that work, in a manner determined by those defendants. This system defines labor as a commodity, and fails to address the actual and true costs of auto glass repair and replacement on a ‘per incident’ and ‘average cost’ basis. In reality, the defendants have created a system that is detrimental to the consumer by increasing auto glass claim costs, and unnecessary windshield replacements (thereby benefiting Safelite and PGW, owners of the ‘CLAIMS MANAGEMENT’ companies, and manufacturers of windshields).”

Harner goes on to say that the insurers “fail to admit and accept that the plaintiff consistently provides lower costs to those defendants and the consumer at large. None of the defendants have alleged or offered proof that any repair shop was ‘recommended’ or ‘suggested’ to any of the plaintiff’s customers concerning the claims in question, making the citation of the informal opinion of the New York State Insurance Department General Counsel moot.”

Harner also adds that he plans to supply witness statements and recordings of phone calls to support his claim of breach of contract.
“The plaintiff, as assignee, is acting on behalf of the insured to collect policy proceeds due under their contract with the insurer for repairs performed by the plaintiff, and where the insured has assigned to the plaintiff the right to collect for said repairs.”

 
[ Member NewsSearch ]  [ ]  [ Tell to friend ]  [ Print ]  [ Close ]  [ ]


Contact
You are not logged in, please sign in to view contact
You can do...if you are member
Info release Promotion
Building shop Online business
Not membership,free register now!
 
LatestMember News
 
 
Home | About | Contact | Use Policy | Copyright privacy | Site Map | Links | Message | Advertising
Copyright 2007-2008 China Architectural and Industrial Glass Association,All Rights Reserved ICP 05037132-4 Technology support:Beijing China Glass Modern Technology Glass Co. Ltd. Contact us:bjzb@glass.org.cn;glass@glass.org.cn Tel:010-68330662 Fax:010-68349127
Powered by Destoon 2.5